Abstract
A leading transdiagnostic framework, RDoC, posits that cognitive abilities are a major functional domain underlying mental health. Specifically, RDoC assumes the relationship between cognitive abilities and mental health to be 1) manifested across neural and genetic units of analysis, 2) environmentally situated, and 3) reliable. To test these assumptions, we applied machine learning and commonality analyses to the ABCD dataset (n=11,876). Mental health predicted cognitive abilities of unseen children at out-of-sample r=.39. At baseline, this cognitive-abilities-mental-health relationship was accounted for by neuroimaging (including 45 types of brain MRI; 71%), by polygenic scores (18%) and by socio-demographics, lifestyles and developments (70%). Moreover, the variance in the cognitive-abilities-mental-health that was captured by socio-demographics, lifestyles and developments was explained by neuroimaging (68%) and polygenic scores (28%). These patterns were similar across two years. Consistent with RDoC, the cognitive-abilities-mental-health relationship was 1) manifested in both neuroimaging and polygenic scores, 2) explained by socio-demographics, lifestyles and developments and 3) reliable across two years. This supports RDoC’s view of cognitive abilities as an integrative-functional domain for the aetiology of mental health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a multisite, longitudinal study designed to recruit more than 10,000 children age 9 to 10 and follow them over 10 years into early adulthood. The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners under award numbers U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA041048, U01DA041089, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041120, U01DA041134, U01DA041148, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U24DA041123, U24DA041147, U01DA041093 and U01DA041025. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/scientists/workgroups/. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not necessarily participate in the analysis or writing of this report. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD consortium investigators. We thank the ABCD team. The authors wish to acknowledge the use of New Zealand eScience Infrastructure (NeSI) high performance computing facilities, consulting support and/or training services as part of this research. New Zealand national facilities are provided by NeSI and funded jointly by NeSI collaborator institutions and through the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment Research Infrastructure programme. URL https://www.nesi.org.nz. Yue Wang and Narun Pat were supported by Health Research Council Funding (21/618), by University of Otago and by Neurological Foundation of New Zealand (2350 PRG).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used publicly available ABCD 4.0 data provided by the ABCD study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/abcd/).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We revised the format of the manuscript to align closer to the journal we are submitting. we also added quality control for temporal variance resting-state MRI, as recommended by the ABCD. This implementation did not change the main results from what we reported in the earlier version of the manuscript.
Data Sharing
We used publicly available ABCD 4.0 data provided by the ABCD study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/abcd/). We uploaded the R analysis script and detailed outputs here: https://github.com/HAM-lab-Otago-University/Commonality-analysis-ABCD4.0