Abstract
Objectives The administration of nursing assistants is closely associated with patient outcomes, but the current situation needs improvement. Studies evaluating intrahospital administration of nursing assistants are limited, and there is a lack of available evidence-based reviews in this field. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital nursing assistants’ administration approaches.
Design Scoping review.
Search strategy We searched fifteen electronic databases for English and Chinese articles published between January 2011 and March 2022. Publications on administration approaches, models and appraisal tools of intrahospital nursing assistants were included.
Results Thirty-six studies were eligible for the review with acceptable quality. We identified one administration model, nine administration methods, fifteen educational programs, and seven appraisal tools from the included studies. The frequency effect size analysis yielded 15 topics of the main focus at four levels, suggesting that included articles were mainly (33%) focused on the competency of nursing assistants, and the lectures were the most (80%) used strategy in quality improvement projects. Evidence from the studies was of low-to-moderate quality, indicating huge gaps between evidence-based research and management practice.
Conclusions A series of practical intrahospital administration approaches was revealed, and fifteen primarily focused topics were identified. We should explore this area more thoroughly using structured frameworks and standardized methodology. This scoping review will help managers find more effective ways to improve the quality of care. Researchers may focus more on evidence-based practice in nursing assistant administration using the 15 topics as a breakthrough.
Strengths and limitations
First scoping review of practical administration approaches for nursing assistants in hospitals.
Presenting the main topics and focus of related articles.
Development of the nursing assistant administration was widely varied among countries.
Most of the included studies were of moderate-to-low methodological quality, and a huge gap exists between evidence-based research and management practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29106.12483/1
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail: zengbentuoxmu{at}outlook.com
E-mail: jinyinghui0301{at}163.com
E-mail: shdcheng{at}xmu.edu.cn
E-mail: dingym60{at}126.com
E-mail: dujw{at}hku-szh.org
We revised this article after receiving comments from reviewers. Since the peer review process and the publication of this article require time, we revised this preprint to follow the latest version.
Data Availability
Data Availability Statement: The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article, and the protocol of this study are openly available in ResearchGate at http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29106.12483/1