Although rationing of scarce health-care resources is inevitable in clinical practice, there is
still limited and scattered information about how physicians perceive and execute this …

Systematic reviews, which were developed to improve policy-making and clinical decision-making,
answer an empirical question based on a minimally biased appraisal of all the …

Background: Publications and discussions of survey research in empirical bioethics have
steadily increased over the past two decades. However, findings often differ among studies …

Background The rising impact of social media on the private and working lives of health
care professionals has made researchers and health care institutions study and rethink the …

Background Routinely collected health data (RCD) are increasingly used for randomized
controlled trials (RCTs). This can provide three major benefits: increasing value through better …

It is widely acknowledged that public health practice raises ethical issues that require a different
approach than traditional biomedical ethics. Several frameworks for public health ethics (…

BACKGROUND: Several quantitative surveys have been conducted internationally to gather
empirical information about physicians’ general attitudes towards health care rationing. Are …

The current, widely established 3R framework for the ethical use of animals in research
consists of three guiding principles, that is, Replacement, Reduction and Refinement, all aiming …

Background Information on patient experience and satisfaction with individual physicians
could play an important role for performance measures, improved health care and health …

OBJECTIVE: To describe the principal role of value judgments in the analysis and synthesis
of evidence as they are involved in systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and health …