RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Generative Model For Evaluating Missing Data Methods in Large Epidemiological Cohorts
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.23.24306030
DO 10.1101/2024.04.23.24306030
A1 Radosavljević, Lav
A1 Smith, Stephen M.
A1 Nichols, Thomas E.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306030.abstract
AB The potential value of large scale datasets is constrained by the ubiquitous problem of missing data, arising in either a structured or unstructured fashion. While there is considerable work on imputation methods, much is focused on small-scale datasets with just tens of variables. When imputation methods are proposed for large scale data, one limitation is the simplicity of existing evaluation methods. Specifically, most evaluations create synthetic data with only a simple, unstructured missing data mechanism, and do not resemble the missing data patterns found in real data. For example, in UK Biobank missing data tends to appear in blocks, because non-participation in one of the sub-studies leads to missingness for all of the sub-study variables.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLR is supported by the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Health Data Science (EP/S02428X/1) \newline The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB) is supported by core funding from the Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z). \newline SS: Wellcome Trust Collaborative Award 215573/Z/19/Z \newline The computational aspects of this research were supported by the Wellcome Trust Core Award Grant Number 203141/Z/16/Z and the NIHR Oxford BRC. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UK Biobank has full ethical approval from the North West Multi-Center Research Ethics Committee. The study received approval from the UKB under application number 8107.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesSimulated datasets produced using the described method are available upon reasonable request to the authors. https://github.com/lavrad99/Generative_Model_Missing_Data/