RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.21.24304663
DO 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304663
A1 Keats, Kelli
A1 Deng, Shiyuan
A1 Chen, Xianyan
A1 Zhang, Tianyi
A1 Devlin, John W.
A1 Murphy, David J.
A1 Smith, Susan E.
A1 Murray, Brian
A1 Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan
A1 Sikora, Andrea
A1 ,
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/22/2024.03.21.24304663.abstract
AB INTRODUCTION Intravenous (IV) medications are a fundamental cause of fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, the association between IV medication use (including volume), administration timing, and FO occurrence remains unclear.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults admitted to an ICU ≥72 hours with available fluid balance data. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight within 72 hours of ICU admission. After reviewing medication administration record (MAR) data in three-hour periods, IV medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess for temporal clusters associated with FO using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Exploratory analyses of the medication cluster most associated with FO for medications frequently appearing and used in the first 24 hours was conducted.RESULTS FO occurred in 127/927 (13.7%) of the patients enrolled. Patients received a median (IQR) of 31 (13-65) discrete IV medication administrations over the 72-hour period. Across all 47,803 IV medication administrations, ten unique IV medication clusters were identified with 121-130 medications in each cluster. Among the ten clusters, cluster 7 had the greatest association with FO; the mean number of cluster 7 medications received was significantly greater in patients in the FO cohort compared to patients who did not experience FO (25.6 vs.10.9. p<0.0001). 51 of the 127 medications in cluster 7 (40.2%) appeared in > 5 separate 3-hour periods during the 72-hour study window. The most common cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of cluster 7 medications to a prediction model with APACHE II score and receipt of diuretics improved the ability for the model to predict fluid overload (AUROC 5.65, p =0.0004).CONCLUSIONS Using ML approaches, a unique IV medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict development of fluid overload in ICU patients compared with traditional prediction models. This method may be further developed into real-time clinical applications to improve early detection of adverse outcomes.Questions Can machine learning detect the presence of time-dependent medication administration patterns that are associated with risk of fluid overload in critically ill patients?Findings Using unsupervised machine learning, a unique IV medication cluster was identified that, when combined with the APACHE II score and diuretic use, improved the ability to predict fluid overload in ICU patients.Meaning These findings suggest that machine learning may be an important tool for analyzing IV mediation administration patterns to predict development of fluid overload. Such models may provide insight into areas where medication administration practices could be optimized to mitigate the risk of fluid overload in this patient population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding through Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality for Drs. Devlin, Murphy, Sikora, Smith, and Kamaleswaran was provided through R21HS028485 and R01HS029009.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Georgia Institutional Review Board waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors