Exploring rat meat consumption patterns, and perception of risks regarding urban rats; implications for rat-borne zoonoses outbreaks and drug resistant pathogens spread in urban areas of Ghana ================================================================================================================================================================================================ * Godwin Deku * Emmanuel Younge * Stephen L. Doggett * Rofela Combey * Isaac Kwame Badu * Mercy Amo Paintsil * Smile Kwabena Ametsi * Angela Ama Wills * Rabiatu Bonnoua Bonney * Kwabena Owusu Amoah ## Abstract **Introduction** This research explores rat meat consumption patterns among urban Ghanaians and their perception of risks associated with urban rats. Two hypotheses on risk perception among urban inhabitants were proposed: the risk of contracting diseases by consuming rat meat and the risk of contracting diseases from peridomestic rats. **Method/Findings** To achieve the objective, a descriptive cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire was conducted that recruited participants from urban settings in Ghana. Of the 829 respondents recruited, around 65% consumed rodents, and of these, 35% consumes rat meat. Through statistical analyses, our data revealed gender, age, region, religion, ethnicity, education, profession and income significantly influenced rat meat consumption and residents’ perception of disease risk. An adjusted multivariable model identified males aged 27 to 34years with no formal or a basic education in southern Ghana as the most likely rat meat consumers. The majority of the participants (60.3%) indicated rats are often present in homes and community drains, and have some awareness where rats can be found in their place of residence. Low perception scores regarding disease risks associated with rat meat consumption were recorded, with the majority of respondents (55-74.9% of 829) perceiving that there were minimal disease threats associated with peridomestic rats. The outcome of this belief was that participants undertook limited rat control in their neighborhood. **Conclusion** The poor perceptions of disease risks regarding rats increases the vulnerabilities of urban Ghanaians to zoonotic spillovers. This underscores the critical need for public education on rat-borne zoonoses in urban Ghana. This survey presents the first baseline study on urban inhabitants’ interactions with peridomestic rats in Ghana and the data will be crucial in the on-going interventions by the Ghana Health Service to minimize transmission of Lassa fever and other rodent-borne diseases and the spread of rodent related drug resistant pathogens. **Author Summary** Human engagement with rats in urban settings provides a mechanism of transferring rat-related zoonoses to the human population. Unlike some other African nations, instances of zoonoses relating to rats are not common in Ghana. Consequently, the public’s perceptions of disease threats posed by urban rats remain largely unexplored. Ghana’s Lassa fever problems began in 2012, and in 2023, the country experienced 14 cases with one death. The study herein enhances our understanding of the epidemiological risk factors in evaluating Ghanaians preparedness against rat-borne zoonoses in urban settings, by examining rat meat consumption patterns and associated risk perception with the rats. A total of 829 Ghanaians were interviewed from urban residential areas on rodent risk behaviors. Results revealed that around 35% of people consume rat meat in urban settings of Ghana and low perception scores on disease risks pertaining to the rats were recorded. The low scores are reflected in the limited attempts by the public to control rats. Rat meat consumption and perception of risks were driven by several sociodemographic variables. Our data could be used by the Ghana Health Service to justify implementation measures for rodent management to mitigate Lassa fever and the spread of antimicrobial resistant pathogens. ## Introduction Global population growth and rapid urbanization poses a critical economic and health challenges [1,2]. This has correlated with the escalation of urban pest populations, including disease vectors, leading to the emergence of new vector-borne illnesses [2,3]. The United Nations estimated that 4.2 billion people currently reside in urban areas worldwide with projections indicating that by 2030, 75% of the global population will live in urban areas [4]. Even Africa and Asia, the least urbanized continents, are anticipated to witness substantial urbanization by 2050 [5] with Ghana having over 50% of its population currently residing in urban areas [6]. As population growth drives expansion of urban land cover, estimated to increase by 1.2 million km2, biodiversity loss becomes inevitable to sustain human population density [7]. Consequently, a significant portion of the world’s population is expected to coexist with urban pests in the foreseeable future [8] and human-pest interactions may increase if control measures are not implemented [9]. Urbanization facilitates pest proliferation due to factors such as industrialization, agricultural and infrastructural development, habitat degradation, forest decline, excessive waste generation, and poor environmental management [10,11]. Rats (*Rattus* sp.), classified as small mammals within the order Rodentia, inhabit forests, peri-urban and urban areas [12]. Their biology, behavior, ecology and adaptability to human environments have been extensively studied due to their economic, medical, social and scientific importance [12,13,14,15,16]. Of the 130 species in the Rattus genus, *Rattus norvegicus* (Norway rat), *Rattus rattus* (black rats) and *Rattus. tanezumi* have successfully colonized urban ecosystems throughout much of human civilization [17,18]. The Norway rat also called the brown rat or the sewer rat is distinguishable from the black rat by its tail, colour, ears and by other morphophysiological features [17]. It exhibits superior competitive aggressiveness and has become one of the most dominant mammals globally [19].The rise in global rat population can be attributed to shifts in human environment, ecology and climate ([2,20] with research indicating a heightened risk of rat infestation in neighborhoods characterized by high poverty levels, aged buildings, dense housing systems and inadequate sanitation [11,21]. Rat meat serves as an important protein source in many countries particularly across Africa, Asia and the Middle East [22,23,24,25,26]. Research in Guinea revealed that 91.5% of the population highly value protein from rodent sources [24]. In Nigeria, of the 200 and 155 study respondents interviewed from urban and peri-urban neighborhoods, 33.5% and 31.1% respectively, consume urban rodents [23]. Various rodent species are consumed in Ghana [27,28]. However, over the past six decades, the majority of the 300+ newly identified infectious diseases have stemmed from wildlife with human-wildlife contact serving as a major transmission pathway [29]. Rodents alone provides reservoir of an estimated 50% of emerging zoonotic pathogens and commensal rats are an ecosystem of numerous disease agents with over fifty-three infectious agents identified thus far [3,20,30,31,32,33]. Diseases such as toxoplasmosis, salmonellosis, plague, leptospirosis, rat-bit fever, hemorrhagic fevers, and zoonotic babesiosis have been associated with rats [3,33]. Transmission of these disease pathogens to humans occurs through various means, including via contamination of water and food, and contact with rat feces and urine [3]. Consuming rat meat raises a more critical risk facilitating the transmission of zoonotic pathogens and epizootics from rat populations to densely populated humans. The act of inhaling aerosolized pathogens from rat fur, the potential exposure to blood-borne and saliva related infections during the carcass handling and butchering, as well as the consumption of undercooked meats, further heighten the risk of zoonotic transmission [34]. These risks were underscored by studies such as Douno and colleagues [35], which explore hunting and consumption of rodents and Mangessho and Colleagues [36] which examine knowledge and perception of pastoralists in Tanzania and hunting and consumption of peridomestic rodents and disease transmission risks in relation to this issue were also discussed by Ter Meulen and colleagues [24] Regions such as West and East Africa have witnessed a prevalence of rat-borne diseases, with Madagascar experiencing frequent plague outbreaks in recent decades [37,38,39,40,41]. Lassa Fever, endemic in most African countries, poses a more critical threat, primarily transmitted by rats in the genus *Mastomys* [42]. Among the major zoonoses in West Africa, Lassa Fever causes approximately 100,000-300,000 infections with around 5,000 deaths annually [42,43], Transmission of the disease may occur through contact with rat feces and body fluids [43,44]. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between increases in rat populations and the proliferation of pathogens vectored by rats [20,45,46]. This escalates the risk of epizootic events spilling over into human communities, highlighting the importance of human-rat interactions. Urban rats inhabits diverse habitat types that are under high chemical/drug selection pressures for pathogens and include waste disposal sites, livestock yard, urban agriculture sites, municipal waste water systems, and biomedical/health care/hospital wastes depots which all harbor a wide range of pathogens [47]. These pathogens may be spread to community food sources, water bodies, household insects, and domestic animals including poultry, and pets through commensal rat activities [47,48]. Drug resistant *Staphylococcus aureaus* were found in household soil, rodents and chickens in Tanzania [49]. In a recently published study, the common rats; *R. norvegicus* and its cousin *R. rattus* were identified in mediating the transfer of multiple drug resistant *Enterobacteriaciae* from livestock into human environment [48]. In this study, 28 of the 53 *E. coli* strains and two of the five *Salmonella* strains identified were multiple drug resistant suggesting urban may be playing a crucial role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistant pathogens (AMR) [31,32,47,48,49,50,51]. Reducing rat populations, particularly in urban settings, presents significant challenges due to various factors. These include dense human populations, extensive infrastructural development [52], nocturnal and sub-nocturnal rodent behavior, the opportunistic nature of urban rats, and their adeptness at establishing nests in obscure locations within human dwellings, and their prolific reproductive ability. Moreover, the behavioral resistance of rats to toxic baits [53] and the resurgence of pesticide resistant rat populations, the banning of glue traps, and second generation anticoagulants, have further exacerbated the global challenge of rat control [54]. In 2020, the Ghanaian media reported a significant event where approximately ten thousand urban rats were killed overnight in the capital city following a major pesticide incident during the active phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, which was indicative that urban rats’ in the capital city have greatly increased. The escalating density, particularly in public places implies an augmented risk of rat-related pathogen transmission to the Ghanaian populace. Despite the cohabitation of Ghanaian urban residents with commensal rats, scant literature addresses the perceptions and apprehensions of the community regarding these rodents. To the best of our knowledge, no prior assessment has been conducted to characterize commensal rats in peridomestic and urban areas in Ghana and the associated potential disease risks. Additionally, public knowledge, perception and awareness of the health risks of rats remain largely unexplored. Previous research in a rural area in Ghana and most countries in Africa and Asia suggested poor knowledge and perceptional unawareness on the disease risks associated with wild animals [55,56,57,58]. This research herein aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Ghanaian public’s rat meat consumption patterns and their perceptions regarding urban rats. We consider two pathways as determinants for potential zoonotic outbreaks: rat meat consumption and human interaction with rats in the urban environment. This paper examines the potential risk for rodent-borne diseases in urban settings of Ghana. ## Materials and Methods ### Ethical Clearance The study received ethical review and approval from the research and publication committee of Accra School of Hygiene under the Ministry of Sanitation and Water Resources affiliated to the University of Cape Coast, Ghana (Approval number: SOH/MSWR/06/01/2023/001). Voluntary anonymous respondents were informed on their willingness to form part of the survey. None of our study participants is below the age of 18(yrs.) and all participants provided informed oral consent before the interview. Written consent were not obtained because not all our study participants were literate hence, the facilitator approved the consent note on their behalf after seeking for their consent response. ### Study area According to the recent population Census [6], Ghana’s population has increased by approximately six million since 2010, reaching a current total population of over 30.8 million in 2021. Administratively, the country is divided into 16 regions (Fig 1) comprising 261 districts. Seven are urbanized and currently over 17 million of the total population is now residing in urban areas. Southern Ghana has eleven (11) regions whereas, the North has five (5). The country has two major religious groups with Christianity being the predominant religion followed by Islam and traditional beliefs. Islam is more prevalent in the northern region of Ghana. Ghana is linguistically diverse, some 79 ethnic groups speaking over 40 languages and 75 dialects [59] with English serving as the national language. The five largest ethnic groups are Akans, Mole-Dagbon, Ewes, Guans, and the Ga-Adangbe. The Akan ethnic group include subgroups such as Asante, Fantes, Akuapim, Akropong, and Akyems constitute around half (47.5%) of the nation’s population and is mainly distributed in the south. Northern Ghana is dominated by the Mole-Dagbon ethnic group and include the Dagombas majority, Mossi, Mamprusi, Nanumbas and Gonja ethnic group comprising 16.6% of the nation’s population [59]. The remaining ethnic groups, including the Ewe, Ga and Guans constitute about 35.9% of the population [59]. ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306236/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306236/F1) Figure 1. Map of Ghana showing the 16 administrative regions in the north and southern divisions ### Study design and data collection instrument This study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional survey aimed at providing a general overview of the rat meat consumption rate among the Ghanaian public, as well as their perception of associated risks, and the sociodemographic drivers. Data collection was conducted solely through interviewer-administered structured questionnaires, predominantly comprising closed ended questions. Respondents were interviewed and guided by a facilitator to complete the questionnaire, with the process typically taking around 10-15mins per participant. The questionnaire design drew upon previous publications [23,34,56,60,61]. Prior to implementation, the questionnaire was pre-tested on 20 respondents in the capital city, Accra Ghana and was subsequently converted to Google forms and shared among interviewers. ### Data collection Environmental health officers and environmental health trainees collected the data for the study. The questionnaire links were sent to these groups via email, and WhatApps to individual Environmental health officers and trainees in the 261 districts located in the 16 administrative regions in Ghana. The questionnaire provided clear instructions and guidelines at the outset, accompanied by the inclusion of a brown rat logo to facilitate recognition by participants. Interviewing Officials who required clarification utilized a phone number provided in the questionnaire. In collecting the data, the officers and trainees firstly displayed the rat picture logo featuring the popular rat local name ‘ekusie’ to aid in recognition by the participants. Interviews were conducted exclusively with individuals residing in urban areas. Participants were anonymous randomly approached at various locations such as streets, lorry stations, shops, hospitals neighbourhood, schools, and other meeting points. Upon consenting, participants were given the questionnaire by the interviewer. Completed questionnaires were submitted to the authors online by the official interviewers. Personal information such as participants’ names, and phone numbers were not collected to maintain confidentiality. The survey was conducted over a period of five months from September 2023 to January 2024 and inclusion criteria was based on the respondents who resided in an urban area of Ghana. Participant from rural areas/villages and unknown areas were excluded. Only participants above the age of 18years were interviewed. The questionnaire was divided into five sections. The first section collected data on socio-demographic characteristics of the study respondents. Data such as region of the respondent, gender, ethnicity, age, education, profession, monthly income, and marital status were recorded. The second section of the questionnaire which included mainly ‘Yes or No’ responses, collected data on rat meat consumption. This included information on whether participants were familiar with rodents and if they consume rodent/rat meats and whether they have different preferences for town rats or wild rats/bush rats, and if willingly purchased rat sold in restaurants. The third section addressed perceptions about health risks associated with rat meat consumption, including if participants perceive that rat carried disease agents and if they believe people could contract diseases from consuming rats. The fourth section collected data on people’s awareness on rat populations in their neighbourhood, such as if they have sighted rats in recent times or observed any rise in the rodent population within their neighborhood. The factors accounting for the rodent increases were recorded along with what they do if they detect rats in their premises. The final section of the questionnaire addressed opinions on the rat population, such as if respondents were concerned about rats, their reasons for the concern, and if attempts were made to manage rats in their neighborhood and homes. ### Data processing and statistical analysis The questionnaire data was exported into Microsoft Excel version 2010 as an Excel file. The data was processed and checked for completeness and consistency. The cleaned data was imported into SPSS v26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) for analysis. Descriptive statistics were presented in frequency and percentage proportions. The analyses of the study data utilized Independent Pearson’s Chi-square test and binary logistic regression (logit) models to demonstrate association between independent variables/predictors (sociodemographic variables) and dependent variables (Yes/No responses). Odd ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were determined from the logistic models. Perception is a latent construct and perception responses were measured using Likert scale. The Likert scale employed five optional responses which included, agree strongly, agree, neutral, disagree and disagree strongly. The highest correct perception score response was ranked/assigned 0.5, and 0.3 for neutral and 0.1 for every incorrect/lowest perception score about a statement. Mean perception scores were compared using non-parametric tests. Mann Whitney U test was used to test the significant proportional differences between two independent variables and the Likert responses (mean perception scores). Whereas, Kruskal Wallis tests of independence were used to compare significant proportional differences among three or more independent variables/predictors and their Likert responses. Pairwise post hoc analysis was employed with Bonferroni correction for multiple tests to separate means and the adjusted p-values were recorded. All assumptions behind the statistical parameters and fitness tests were met. ## Results ### Sociodemographic characteristics of the general public respondents Table 1 depicts the sociodemographic profile of the respondents. In all, 829 questionnaires were received from 79 districts spanning 16 administrative regions throughout Ghana. The study encompassed 28 out of the 75 ethnic groups in Ghana with the Akans, Ewes, Gas and Mole-Dagbon constituting the predominant groups. The Akans and Mole-Dagbon, the primary ethnic entities in Ghana comprised the majority (61%) of the study participants. A higher proportion of responses originated from southern Ghana (65.7%) compared with the north. The gender distribution skewed towards males (59.8%). About half (53.2%) of the participants were unmarried. The age distribution revealed a significant majority (79.1%) falling within the 21-44 years group. A substantial proportion (63.6%) of the participants had attained senior high school education, or higher. Regarding religious affiliation, Christians accounted for more than half (53.4%). In terms of profession, students and traders constituted around 44.6%, while health professionals, teachers and others comprised about 38.3%. Nearly half of the study participants were not engaged in any form of employment. Regarding income 30.2% of the survey respondents reported earning between 300-500 Ghanaian cedis monthly whiles 27.9% reported incomes ranging from 600-1100 Ghanaian cedis monthly. Additionally, around half of the study participants resided in family-owned homes. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306236/T1) Table 1. Sociodemographic information of the study respondents. ### Rat meat consumption Table 2 presents the findings on the participants’ consumption practices. Out of the 829 participants, the high majority (82.2%) exhibited familiarity with rodents and most (64.8%) acknowledged consuming such animals. However approximately 35% of those who consumed rodents consume rat meat. Around 22% had consumed rat meat recently and about 34% expressed willingness to consume the meat when presented with the opportunity. On average, 26% of the respondents could recall someone who had consumed rat meat recently, expressed willingness to buy rat killed from their neighbourhood, consumed rat meat sold in a restaurant or engage in hunting and consuming rats that visited their premises. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306236/T2) Table 2. Rat meat consumption among the respondents ### Sociodemographic predictors of rat meat consumption Table 3 presents frequency and percentage summaries demonstrating that a higher proportion of males (23.8% of 829) consume rat meat than females (11.4%). Additionally unmarried (singles) consume rat meat more than those who are married. Those in age 27-34 years consume rat meat more than the other age groups. Ethnically, Ewes (n=47 > 34), and the Mamprusi (n=15>7), significantly surpass non-rat meat consumers. Those with senior high school education, residing in the southern region part of the country, Christians and Akans, unemployed, and people having an income of less than 500 Ghanaian cedis, monthly, demonstrated a higher proportion of rat meat consumption than their counterparts. Thus there were associations between rat meat consumption and sociodemographic variables. Pearson’s Independent Chi-square test suggested that at 95% Confidence Interval (CI), gender, age, education, region, religion, ethnicity, profession, and income independently associated with rat meat consumption in Ghana (Table 3). However, no significant association exist between marital status, employment, and residential status with rat meat consumption (Table 3). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/24/2024.04.23.24306236/T3) Table 3. Sociodemographic variables and rat meat consumption ### Logistic regression analysis of sociodemographic predictors and rat meat consumption Bivariate and multivariable odd ratios from logistics regression models regressing sociodemographic variables (independent variables) with rat meat consumption variables unveiled significant associations. In the bivariate analysis, males exhibited 3.3 and 1.7 times higher odds of consuming rodent meat (OR=3.34; 95% CI: 2.47-4.50) and rat meat (OR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.23-2.23) respectively, compared to females. Participants aged 27-34years had 2.3 and 1.8 times higher odds of consuming rodent meat (OR=2.3; 95% CI: 1-62-3.32) and rat meat (OR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.28-2.63) respectively, compared to participants less than 26 years old. Participants with an age 35 years and above (35+) had 4.7 times and 1.6 times higher odds of consuming rodent meat (OR=4.676; 95%CI: 3.226-6.779) and rat meat (OR=1.64;95% CI:1.16-2.32) respectively, than those with age 26 years and below. Compared to Christians, Muslims had 1.4 times higher odds of consuming rodent meat (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.07-1.97). On the contrary, Muslims had 0.46 times lower odds of eating rat meat than Christians (OR=0.46; 95% CI: 0.34-0.64). Compared to the Akans ethnic group, Mole-Dagbon (OR=2.06; 95% CI: 1.42-3.1) and others (OR=1.75; 95% CI: 1.23-2.48), had high odds of eating rodent meat. On the contrary, Mole-Dagbon had 0.4 times lower odds of eating rat meat compared to the Akans (OR=0.37; 95% CI: 0.25-0.56). Regarding professions, health professionals/teachers (0.53; 95%CI: 0.34-0.82), and students (OR=0.28; 95%CI: 0.19-0.43), had lower odds of consuming rodent meat than traders. Students had 0.6 times lower odds of eating rat meat than traders (OR=O.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.90). Compared with those receiving monthly income of 600 (GHS.) and above, those with 500(GH.) and below (including those with no monthly income) had 1.8 times higher odds of eating rat meat (OR=1.81; 95%CI: 1.24-2.65). With reference to region, Southerners had 0.6 times lower odds of consuming rodents than the Northerners (OR=0.63; 95%CI: 0.46-0.86). On the contrary, southerners had three times higher odds of consuming rat meat than Northerners (OR=2.99; 95%CI: 2.14-4.19). Compared to those below senior high school education (